Wed 19 Sep 2012

Kate Middleton Topless Photos are banned but Prophet's blasphemy (terrorism and degrading human dignity) is allowed. Why? 

If disrespecting religion and human dignity comes under Freedom of Expression then why Kate's topoless pictures doesn't come under Freedom of Expression?

 

Kate+Topless+and+Hijab.jpg

Respect of 1 princess is acknowledged by a law, what about the Respect of most beloved Holy Prophet of more than 2 billion Mulsims followers of one of the largest religion is not acknowledged by such law.

What about the United States constitution Eighth Ammendment words "The 'essential predicate' is 'that a punishmenet must not by its severity be degrading to human dignity,' especially torture."... What about degrading the human dignity and torturing of more than 2 billion Muslims?

Interesting, how the western media endlessly view the hijab as a sign of OPPRESSION. But the moment the Princess is indecently exploited by French paparazzi, the newspapers who published "TOPLESS PHOTOS OF PRINCESS KATE". All of a sudden, having a headscarf is ELEGANT, INNOCENT, MODEST. 

The double standards and hypocrisy of the media and western world. Isn't the guiltiness of non Muslims!!!

 

Categories : Thoughts / Lessons
E-mail this post to someone or Comments (1)

Comments

9/19/2012 | Ahmed  United States
100% agreed!

Add Comment Post comment

 
 
 
   Country flag

Loading

For mobile, tablets or touch devices, if verify button is disabed, please press Enter after entering captcha verfication text than click Verify button.